InterAction - American Council for Voluntary International Action


 

Refugees

The Committee on Migration & Refugee Affairs: Protection

Humanitarian Partnerships Working Group

Issues Around UNHCR-NGO Relations

Food Security in Refugee Settings
Food security for refugees is a growing concern for the international humanitarian community. As a result of recent budget cuts by UN institutions, bilateral donors, and NGOs, refugee food rations have been cut in a number of refugee settings.

According to UNHCR, more than a million refugees worldwide may go hungry this year due to food shortages. Hundreds of thousands of refugees have already experienced drastic reductions in their food rations. Internally displaced persons in Azerbaijan face a complete cut in food assistance in 2005.

While food ration cuts have occurred throughout the world, African refugees have been particularly affected by the shortfalls. In October 2004, maize and pulse rations were cut by 25% in 13 refugee camps in Tanzania. A recent UNHCR-WFP mission in November found rising rates of malnutrition among 400,000 Burundian and Congolese refugees in Tanzania.

Meanwhile, the distribution of cereal and pulses was cut in half for refugees in Zambia in late 2004. This may be followed by further reductions in the overall food ration for Zambia’s refugees, putting as many as 87,000 at risk of malnutrition.

Ethiopia and Kenya also face imminent cuts in food assistance for refugees, and rations for refugees and IDPs in the Democratic Republic of Congo may be cut as much as 30 percent.

As noted by the International Rescue Committee, Jesuit Refugee Service, Refugees International, and the U.S. Committee for Refugees in March 2003, food ration cuts pose serious threats to the safety and well-being of refugee populations, including: making refugees more vulnerable to sexual exploitation and violence; further limiting already restricted opportunities for refugees to ensure livelihoods; and contributing to tensions and conflicts between refugees and host communities that could result in the forcible repatriation of refugee populations by host governments.

For more information on food security concerns for refugee populations, view the folloing documents:

“WFP and UNHCR Call for Urgent Aid for Refugees in Africa”

“Africa’s Refugees Need Urgent Food Aid, Say UN Relief Agencies”

“African Refugees Face Severe Food Shortages”

“Chad: First Signs of Malnutrition Among Refugees, MSF Appeals for Urgent UN Intervention”

“UN Refugee and Food Officials Urge More Support for Africa"

Annual Pre-ExCom NGO Consultations
Each year, over 200 representatives from more than 150 organizations meet for the annual Pre-ExCom NGO Consultations, which precede the UNHCR Executive Committee meetings. Participants include representatives from national and international, advocacy and operational non-governmental organizations (NGOs), as well as UN agencies. The meetings provide an opportunity for dialogue and discussion on a range of issues of interest to NGOs and UNHCR, alike.

Pre-ExCom 2004, held 28-30 September, experienced the largest turnout in the event’s history of more than 20 years. Over 300 individuals representing 222 NGOs, international organizations, and UN agencies from 80 countries participated. The event featured a series of nine workshops on a range of operational issues, as well as 5 regional sessions.

InterAction was invited by UNHCR to co-organize a Pre-ExCom workshop on security. Michael O’Neill, Director of Security at Save the Children USA and co-chair of the InterAction Security Advisory Group, served as a speaker at the session, which explored mechanisms enhanced collaboration between UNHCR and its partners around security. Issues raised at the workshop include coordination with military forces and the preservation of humanitarian space, information-sharing protocols, and the inclusion of implementing partners in Security and Evacuation Plans.

For more information about this workshop or the annual Pre-ExCom NGO Consultations, click here.

UNHCR Funding
In recent years, UNHCR faced one of the most serious funding crises in its history. A global recession and country budget cuts left the agency with a significant budgetary shortfall in 2002. That year, UNHCR had an annual budget of $800 million plus a $200 million supplemental budget for operations in Afghanistan. The agency received only $900 million in donations from member states, however, and as a result was required to cut nearly $100 million from its programmatic budget.

Refugee agencies have noted the significant impacts of reduced funding on refugee populations throughout the world, ranging from cuts in food rations and other material assistance to the suspension of health, education, and self-sufficiency services to the displaced.

The funding crisis has had a tremendous impact on African refugees. In February 2003, UNHCR and the World Food Program (WFP) released a joint appeal for urgent aid to refugee populations in Africa. Due to the lack of funding, many food aid programs for African refugees were curtailed. In some camps, daily food rations were cut by as much as 50%, leaving refugees with inadequate food supplies, posing increasing health risks, and rendering the displaced increasingly vulnerable to exploitation and other protection concerns.

Inadequate resources continue to pose a significant challenge to UNHCR in providing much-needed assistance and protection to refugees and other persons of concern. In December 2004, the agency had received $933 million out of its budget of $1.23 billion for that year.

The UNHCR recently launched an appeal for its 2005 budget totaling $1.1 billion to assist an estimated 17 million refugees and other persons of concern.

For more information about UNHCR funding, click here.

Convention Plus
Following the Global Consultations on International Protection and the endorsement of the Agenda for Protection by the Executive Committee in October 2002, the High Commissioner for Refugees called for the development of new tools for the protection of refugees and persons of concern to complement the 1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol. These tools, in the form of multilateral special agreements, are what the High Commissioner calls “Convention Plus.”

Convention Plus special agreements will likely address such issues as the creation of comprehensive plans of action (CPA) to ensure more effective responses to mass influx; the targeting of development assistance to achieve more equitable burden-sharing, promote self-reliance of refugees and returnees, and achieve durable solutions to refugee crises; the establishment of multilateral commitments for resettlement; and the identification of roles and responsibilities of countries of origin, transit, and destination in “irregular” or “secondary movement” situations.

There will be avenues for NGO input into these processes.

The High Commissioner held the first Forum on Convention Plus in June 2003.

For more information about the High Commissioner’s Convention Plus initiative, click here.

 

 © 2002 InterAction    
1400 16th Street NW, Suite 210
Washington, DC 20036
(202) 667-8227 ia@interaction.org
Home | Contact Us | Privacy